Guid Essay

Guid Essay

Creep Behaviour of Materials

Chen Yi Ling 

The objectives of the experiment are:

  • To measure the creep deformation in lead and polypropylene at room temperature
  • To determine the effect of stress on the creep deformation of lead and polypropylene
  • To appreciate the difference in creep behaviour between these two classes of materials
  • To be aware of creep as a design consideration
  1. Theory

2.1. Introduction

Deformation under a certain applied load over a period of time at a particular temperature is defined as creep, and it limits the load carrying capacity among structual materials.

When subjected to a stress greater or equal to its yield stress, the material deforms plastically. Alternately, when the stress is less than its yield stress, the material will deform elastically.

However, when the material has to withstand stress at high temperature, permanent deformation will occur even if the stress is below the yield stress obtained from a tensile test. Under a constant stress, the strain vary as a function of time as shown in Figure 2.1.1. [1]

Elevating Essay Writing: Delivering Excellence and Literary Distinction

Crafting Essays that Leave a Lasting Impression

In the realm of academic expression, where words have the power to shape ideas and inspire minds, we stand as a beacon of excellence. As dedicated essayists, we take immense pride in our ability to weave words into captivating narratives, enlightening arguments, and thought-provoking analyses. Our journey as essay writers has been one of continuous growth and meaningful impact. Let’s explore some remarkable instances where our expertise has made a significant difference.

Guiding Students Towards Success

Our journey is intertwined with the success stories of numerous students who sought our guidance. In one instance, a struggling undergraduate approached us with an intricate topic in the field of sociology. Through meticulous research and a nuanced understanding of the subject, we formulated an essay that not only secured the student’s academic standing but also ignited their passion for social sciences.

Similarly, a graduate student grappling with the complexities of literary criticism found solace in our expertise. We delved into the depths of literary theory, dissecting texts and exploring nuanced interpretations. The resulting essay not only garnered accolades but also instilled a newfound confidence in the student’s analytical abilities.

Breathing Life into Topics: Examples of Our Endeavors

  1. The Intersection of Technology and Society: In an era dominated by technological advancements, we embarked on an essay that explored the intricate relationship between technology and society. By seamlessly blending sociological insights with technological trends, we created an essay that resonated with readers across disciplines.

  2. Environmental Ethics and Sustainability: With environmental concerns taking center stage, we took on the challenge of crafting an essay that delved into the ethical dimensions of sustainability. Through rigorous research, we presented a compelling argument that not only addressed the urgency of the issue but also proposed actionable solutions.

  3. Literary Analysis: Unraveling Symbolism: Literary works often conceal layers of symbolism. In an essay dedicated to the works of a renowned author, we unraveled the subtle threads of symbolism woven into the narrative. This essay not only celebrated the author’s craftsmanship but also offered readers a deeper appreciation for the written word.

A Tapestry of Literary Accolades

Our dedication to the art of essay writing has not gone unnoticed. Over the years, we have had the privilege of being recognized in esteemed literary competitions that celebrate creativity and intellectual prowess. These accolades serve as a testament to our commitment to delivering essays that transcend the ordinary and venture into the extraordinary.

Literary Award Highlights

  1. Eloquent Prose Prize: Awarded by the Prestigious Wordsmith Guild, this accolade celebrated our mastery over language and the art of storytelling. The essay that earned us this honor explored the nuanced emotions of human existence through a compelling narrative.

  2. Critical Thinker’s Commendation: Presented by the Symposium of Intellectual Thought, this award acknowledged our prowess in critical analysis. Our essay, dissecting the philosophical underpinnings of existentialism, showcased our ability to navigate complex ideologies with finesse.

  3. Literary Luminary Award: Conferred by the Literary Confluence, this award celebrated our contribution to literary discourse. The winning essay, an exploration of the intersection between culture and identity, captured the essence of diverse human experiences.

Conclusion: Pioneering Excellence in Essay Writing

As we reflect on our journey as essayists, we are filled with a profound sense of purpose. Our dedication to delivering exceptional essays that enlighten, engage, and inspire remains unwavering. Through intricate narratives, incisive analyses, and unwavering commitment to the written word, we have carved a niche for ourselves in the realm of academic and literary excellence. Join us as we continue to shape ideas, foster growth, and transcend boundaries through the power of the written essay.

The different stages of creep are:

Primary Creep/Transient Creep

  • Strain rate decreases with time and deformation becomes difficult as strain increases. (i.e. Strain Hardening)

Secondary Creep/Steady Creep

  • Strain rate is constant
  • The occurrence is due to the balance between strain hardening and strain softening (Structure Recovery)

Tertiary Creep/Approaching Rupture

  • Strain rate increases with time and the material is fractured.
  • Increase in creep rate is due to the increasing number of damages such as cavities, cracks and necking.
  • The damaging phenomena reduce the cross-sectional area, which increase the applied stress when placed under constant load.

Viscoelastic materials such as polymers and metals are susceptible to creep. When subjected to a sudden force, the response of a polymeric material can be detected using the Kelvin-Voigt model (Figure 2.1.2)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Kelvin_Voigt_diagram.svg/200px-Kelvin_Voigt_diagram.svg.png

Viscoelastic materials experience an increase in strain with time when subjected to a constant stress, this is termed as viscoelastic creep. At t0 (Figure 2.1.3), viscoelastic material is able to maintain for a significant long period of time when loaded with a constant stress. The material eventually fails when it responds to the stress with an increasing strain. In contrast, when the stress is maintained for a shorter period of time, the material experience an initial strain until t1 in which the stress is relieved. The strain then immediately decrease gradually to a residual strain. [3]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Creep.svg/250px-Creep.svg.png

In this experiment, we will study the creep behaviour of a low-melting point metal (Lead, Pb) and a polymer (Polypropylene, PP) at room temperature.

2.2. Creep in Metals

Creep can be observed in all metals if its operating temperature exceeds 0.3 to 0.5Tm [5] (Tm = Absolute Melting Temperature) (Figure 2.2.1)

Creep strain (ε) depends on several variables, the most important variables are stress (σ) and temperature (T). Using stress and temperature, the creep rate () can be defined as:

——————– (Equation 2.2.1)

Where,

A = Constant

n = Stress Exponent

E = Activation energy for creep

R = Universal gas constant

Creep rate () increase as stress and temperature increase, hence Equation 2.2.1 can be redefined as:

——————– (Equation 2.2.2)

Whereby n is the slope of vs lnA at constant temperature.

2.3. Creep in Polymers

The creep in polymers is almost similar to the creep in metal as it is depends on stress and temperature, with a few exceptions. Comparing Figure 2.2.1 and Figure 2.3.1, the two graphs look similar except that Figure 2.3.1 has a recovery phase, which is termed as the reversal of creep.

Possessing viscoelastic properties, the behavior of the material can be predicted using the Kelvin-Voigt model (Figure 2.1.2) as mentioned earlier, and hence, it will be used in this experiment.

Equation 2.3.1 shows the relationship between the creep strain (ε) and time under constant stress:

——————– (Equation 2.3.1)

Where and are the constant of the spring and dashpot respectively (Figure 2.1.2)

On the other hand, Equation 2.3.2 shows the creep strain in relation to time:

——————– (Equation 2.3.2)

Where is a constant.

The data obtained can be plotted into an isochronous graph by taking the constant time section through the creep curves for a specific temperature. And the results obtained formed the isochronous graph.

  1. Experimental Procedures

3.1 Equipment for Creep Testing

The load was applied steadily to the specimen using the lever principle shown in Figure 3.1.1. Steel pins were used to kept the specimen in place on one side of the lever and the weight hanger on the other.

The weight hanger consist of 2 pinning position; the topmost hole was used when the hanger and loads were in rest position while the lower hole was used when the hanger was loaded.

The following table shows the mass for the parts of the equipment which should be taken into consideration during the calculation of tensile force on the specimen

Parts

Mass (kg)

Lever Arm

0.4

Weight Hanger

0.16

Pins

0.04 each

If m was the mass of the load on the weight hanger, then the tensile force acting on the specimen can be defined by taking moment about pivot as shown in Figure 3.1.2.

[(F+0.04) x 42] – [0.40 x 147] – [(0.16 + 0.04 +m) x 336] = 0

————— (Equation 3.1.1)

Where, g is the acceleration due to gravity = 9.807m/s2

The extension of the specimen was measured using a dial gauge (DG). The DG was placed into a tube tightened using a nylon pinch screw to hold the DG in its place. It should be noted that the nylon pinch screw should only be tighten sufficiently to prevent the DG from moving when the loads were placed.

The top of the DG was attached to the set up using a grooved plate which was bolted to the lever arm. This arrangement was to ensure the groove in this plate was two times the distance from the pivot to the centre of the specimen. Hence, the extension of the specimen detected by the DG was twice the actual extension of the specimen. And to counter for inaccuracy when zeroing the DG, an additional 3mm was taken into account before the start of the experiment.

Thus, the actual extension of the specimen can be calculated by:

————— (Equation 3.1.2)

3.2 Experiment Methods

For the measurement of creep in lead, the load applied would be 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1kg. For the measurement of creep in polypropylene, the load applied would be 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9kg.

Before conducting the experiment, the width, length, thickness and gauge length of the specimen was measured thrice using an electronic vernier caliper; the readings used for the calculation would be the average reading (highlighted in orange).

Lead

Load (kg)

Width (mm)

Length (mm)

Thickness (mm)

Gauge Length (mm)

0.9

4.92

89.64

1.75

20.09

4.91

89.43

1.74

19.52

4.88

89.53

1.74

19.99

4.903

89.533

1.743

18.867

1.0

4.91

89.46

1.73

20.83

4.93

89.46

1.76

20.78

4.84

89.49

1.74

20.66

4.893

89.47

1.743

20.757

1.1

4.82

89.19

1.72

22.21

4.81

89.04

1.76

22.70

4.83

89.24

1.71

22.75

4.82

89.157

1.73

22.553

         

Polypropylene

Load (kg)

Width (mm)

Length (mm)

Thickness (mm)

Gauge Length (mm)

0.6

4.78

89.04

0.88

21.28

0.7

4.77

89.30

0.93

19.13

0.8

4.91

89.02

0.90

21.50

         

3.2.1 Experiment 1: Creep of Lead

  1. The lever arm was held in place using 2 pins; 1 of it to be inserted into the bearing block and the other onto the topmost hole of the weight hanger.
  2. Attached the specimen onto the set up using 2 pins.
  3. Place the Dial Gauge into the hole/tube but do not tighten the nylon screw yet.
  4. Attach the groove plate at the top of the Dial Gauge and lever arm and secure it using a thumb nut.
  5. Release the pin holding the weight hanger to take up any free movement.
  6. Make sure the specimen was placed vertically.
  7. Carefully adjust the Dial Gauge until the inner dial reads 3mm and the outer ring reads 0, then tighten the nylon screw.
  8. Load the required weight onto the hanger.
  9. Raise the loaded weight hanger to the lower hole (loading position) and insert the pin.
  10. Gently release the load and start stop watch.
  11. Record reading every 15 seconds for 30 minutes or till the specimen ruptures.

In order to determine the secondary creep rate for each applied stress, 3 extension-time creep curves were required. The creep rate can be calculated using the following equation:

————— (Equation 3.2.1.1)

Where

In this experiment, ln vs ln plot was required. Hence, the stress () on the specimen is given by:

————— (Equation 3.2.1.2)

Where, F is the load applied to the specimen (N)

3.2.2 Experiment 2: Creep of Polypropylene

The test of creep of polypropylene is similar to that of lead, with a couple of exceptions. Before placing the specimen onto the set up, 2 ‘U’ brackets should be fitted over the 2 ends of the specimen. For polypropylene, elastic recovery was possible hence the specimen was not required to be tested until failure. Note that 15 minutes, 12 minutes and 7 minutes were the extension time required for 0.6kg, 0.7kg and 0.8kg respectively

  1. Place the required load onto the weight hanger.
  2. Record the extension for every 15 seconds for specific duration.
  3. After the extension period, remove the weights on the weight hanger and continue to record the reading (elastic recovery phase) every 15 seconds for 10 minutes or when the needle on the Dial Gauge stop moving for 1 minute.
  4. Repeat for other loads.
  5. Plot extension vs time curve to show the creep and recovery curve.

In this experiment, strain vs stress plot was required. Hence, the strain rate () on the specimen is given by:

————— (Equation 3.2.2.1)

Where

  1. Results
    1. Results for Lead

The increment of extension () was selected based on the results reflected on Figure 4.1.1.

The creep rate (έ) of Lead was determine using Equation 3.2.1.1.

Load (kg)

[l2 – l1]

Creep Rate, (s-1)

0.9

19.87

1.0

20.76

1.1

22.55

The stress () applied onto the lead specimen was calculated using Equation 3.2.1.2.

Load, kg

Applied Load, F (N)

Area, A (mm2)

Stress, (MPa)

0.9

99.639

8.526

11.686

1.0

107.484

8.525

12.608

1.1

115.330

8.339

13.830

By adding ln to the values of and έ,

Load, kg

ln

lnέ

0.9

2.458

-10.119

1.0

2.534

-8.798

1.1

2.627

-8.310

Using the data from Table 4.1.1, we can plot a linear graph.

Based on Figure 4.1.2, the stress exponent (n) from the straight line was 10.503.

  1. Results for Polypropylene

A sudden drop was observed for 0.7kg, this was due to human error as results was not recorded promptly on specific time.

Using Equation 3.2.1.2 & 3.2.2.1, the stress and strain rate is shown below:

Load

Width (mm)

Thickness (mm)

Area, A (mm2)

Applied Load, F (N)

Stress, (MPa)

0.6

4.78

0.88

4.206

76.102

18.094

0.7

4.77

0.93

4.436

83.948

18.924

0.8

4.91

0.90

4.419

91.794

20.773

Load, kg

Extension (mm)

Strain Rate,

45s

240s

405s

45s

240s

405s

0.6

21.28

1.04

1.32

1.44

0.049

0.062

0.068

0.7

19.13

1.19

1.47

1.59

0.062

0.077

0.083

0.8

21.50

1.49

2.42

3.17

0.069

0.113

0.147

               

Load, kg

Stress, (MPa)

Strain Rate,

45s

240s

405s

0.6

18.094

0.049

0.062

0.068

0.7

18.924

0.062

0.077

0.083

0.8

20.773

0.069

0.113

0.147

         

Based on Figure 4.2.1, when stress is constant, the strain increases as time increases, which tallies with the theory.

5. Discussion

    1. Usefulness of the Plot of lnσ vs lnέ

By plotting lnσ against lnέ, we can determine the gradient (n) or the stress exponent of the specimen, which correspond to the controlling mechanism of creep under testing conditions.

  1. Stress Exponent for Lead

The stress exponent indicates the influence of deformation rate on the mechanical strength of the specimen.[7]

At low stresses, n equals to 1, which indicates pure diffusion creep. At high stresses, n > 1, indicating other creeping mechanism besides pure diffusion.

  1. Factors affecting the stress exponent value

The stress exponent for lead in this experiment was found out to be 10.503. And the factors which affects the value is the type of creeping mechanism behind the specimen.

Some creeping mechanisms include Coble creep (Grain boundary diffusion) and Dislocation creep/climb (Power law creep).[8]

  1. Creep of Metals in Design Consideration

The following are some methods to minimize creeping in metals:

  • Employ materials with high Tm
  • Reduce the effect of grain boundaries by using a single crystal with large grains or adding solid solutions to eliminate vacancies[9]

Creep is an important consideration for when a component have to support a load at temperatures where Tabs/TM > 0.4.[10]

For high temperature, creep is an important consideration in these three areas:

  • Displacement-limited applications such as turbine rotors in jet engines
  • Rupture-limited applications such as high pressure steam pipes
  • Stress Relaxation limited applications such as tightened bolts and suspended cables [11]
    1. Viscoelastic Behaviour

Materials which exhibits both viscous and elastic property during deformation is known as viscoelasticity.[12] In this experiment, both lead and polypropylene exhibits viscoelasticity to different extend. For lead, the time taken in which the specimen rupture decreases as the stress increases. However, its viscoelasticity is not high hence, its recovery phase is not as significant as polypropylene. Furthermore, the structure of lead is more crystalline than polypropylene, which means it is more brittle and more prone to rupture.

For polypropylene, the extension increases as the stress increases. The extension and recovery rate of each load are as follow:

Load (kg)

Extension (%)

Recovery (%)

0.6

44.9

22.1

0.7

38.9

Not applicable due to experimental error

0.8

63.0

15.5

Recovery rate is possible on polypropylene specimen because it has higher elasticity due to its amorphous structure. The amorphous structure untangles and lengthens out until it becomes crystalline.

http://staging-bc.wp.barnhardt.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/07/Amorphous-and-Crystalline-Areas-of-Polymers-500x173.jpg

  1. Conclusion

In conclusion, the results obtained from the experiment is true to theory. Unfortunately, during the creep test for lead, some results are missing due to some human error resulting in an incomplete graph as depicted in Figure 4.2.1.

For the creep in lead, load 1.0kg and 1.1kg rupture before 30 minutes. This shows that the heavier the load, the faster the creep rate. At even high temperature, t

 

Click to rate this entry!
(Votos: 0 Promedio: 0)

Contact

We will be happy to help you and inform you about any questions.

WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH YOU

Leave a Comment